What best defines the general concept of peer review?

The general concept of peer review is best defined by assessment conducted by individuals with similar training and expertise. In healthcare and various professional fields, peer review involves a process where professionals evaluate each other's work to ensure quality, accuracy, and adherence to established standards. This process is essential because it leverages the insights and expertise of those who understand the nuances of the work being assessed, allowing for more informed and constructive feedback.

This approach enhances accountability and promotes continuous improvement within the profession. The evaluators are typically familiar with the standards and practices relevant to the specific field, making their assessments particularly valuable. This collaborative evaluation can lead to better patient outcomes and higher quality of care as professionals learn from one another's strengths and weaknesses.

The other options present different concepts that do not capture the essence of peer review as defined within professional settings. For instance, a review conducted by a third-party auditor is an external evaluation that may not involve the nuanced understanding a peer has of similar professional practices. A formal complaint process against providers is focused on addressing grievances rather than constructive assessment. The review of administrative practices in healthcare relates more to management processes than to peer assessment of professional competencies and clinical decisions.